Saturday, July 29, 2006

Mel Gibson goes Ballistic
One Angry Christian
7/29/06


I really am having a hard time believing this, but if it's true I'm seriously in shock.

It is interesting to contemplate the idea that he was trying to stir up anti jewish sentiment with his movie, and yet ... he did exactly the opposite. America has never been more openly supportive of Israel. Interesting no?


-One Angry Christian
The Weekly Funnies
One Angry Christian
7/29/06

This week I really don't have the energy to dig up stuff for the funnies, BUT I did happen to come across a video that will have you rolling. Without further adieu I present to you ... Glenn Beck does Middle Eastern History Volume 1!

-One Angry Christian

Friday, July 28, 2006

It's starting in the US now
One Angry Christian
7/28/06


5 shot, 1 fatally at Seattle Jewish center
By TIM BOOTH, Associated Press Writer
8 minutes ago

SEATTLE - At least five people were shot, one of them fatally, Friday afternoon at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, and one person was arrested, authorities said.

Read More


Anyone care to wager a bet as to whether this is random or jihadi inspired?

Not one shot was fired after "The passion of the Christ", but Hollywood and most of the Democrapic leadership was in an uproar. The Jewish leaders were angered (if not justifiably at least understandably) by the movie, and critics called it "too violent" while movies like "Kill Bill" were labled "artistic".

Now we have people screaming "kill the Jews" in the streets of San Francisco and all around the world. Terrorists fire rockets into quiet cities directing their destruction at apartment buildings, retirement homes, schools, and hospitals. Hollywood is silent. The Democratic leadership calls it "freedom of speech", and the Jewish leaders are angered, rightfully so.

Where are the peace protesters? Where are the special interest groups that want to stop hatred? Where is the defense of civil rights, and the outrage at what these butchers are doing?
This might not be the direct work of a militant muslim, but it is surely the influence of Islamofascism in our very own nation.

-One Angry Christian
My very first contest
One Angry Christian
7/28/06

Alright kiddies. I have a home work assignment for anyone who isn't too lazy to google. I want to know how much money Cindy Sheehan has made off of her son's death. Specifically I want to know how much the DOD has payed her.

For extra credit you can find out how much she's made off of her books and tours and donations. I want credible sources, and exact figures. No guessing. No independent blogs without THEIR source being cited from a government institution or a nationally recognized publication.

The first person to post the amount with a cited source wins. If you aren't the first, but you can pull up how much she's made from donations, books, tours, and what not with a legitimate source (you'll have to be first on the extra credit) I will call it a tie.

The winner gets a three month free premium membership (payed for by yours truly) to Bill Oreilly's website. If this works I may run more contests later. ... maybe.

On your mark. Get set... GO!

-One Angry Christian
(I'd be surprised if ANYONE can find it)
reminds me of the diary of Anne Frank. Hard to read.
Cindy Sheehand for TEH W1N!!!
One Angry Christian
7/28/06


Wow. Just when I thought Cindy Sheehan couldn't be anymore dishonest or under handed ... she proves me wrong. Why do I get this sinking feeling that all of the democrats who supported her are now fleeing in terror? If they're not their voters soon will be. GO CINDY!

====update=====

link fixed YO!

-One Angry Christian
Anatomy of a photograph
One Angry Christian
7/28/06


For those who missed this particular link I'm posting it again. This is yet another blatant example of media bias. Judge for yourself.

The image for the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle:




Notice how up close this image is, and how little of what's going on around the person is being shown.

Now, here is a different photograph taken by the author of "Anatomy of a photograph" without cutting the rest of the crowd out.



Notice the chinese communist emblem one the director's shirt. Interesting, no?

-One Angry Christian
Warning: Graphic Images
One Angry Christian
7/28/06

Last night I was at my computer reading bulletins on my myspace 1ac account. I noticed that one of my fellow conservative bloggers posted a bulletin with an anti Israel message. The message was powerful, and the images were ... graphic to say the least.

This is exactly why we as conservatives have to be not only on the look out for propaganda, but on the ready to respond to it. We can not let this misinformation go unanswered.

DO NOT SCROLL DOWN IF YOU HAVE A WEAK STOMACH!

I took about ten minutes and redesigned their flier. Here is the original and the end product of what I did:



Image from www.fromisraeltolebanon.com



As you can see the pro terrorist movements are going to insane extremes to support their point of view and shock people into agreeing with them. Most people when confronted with images of this nature lose their immediate sense of reason. They just can not believe what they're seeing and become willing to accept whatever villain is presented. We simply can not allow this to go unanswered.

-One Angry Christian

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Epiphanies before bed
One Angry Christian
7/27/06

I was running through one of my other profiles reading messages that someone sent me in response to a link I posted. I read the response of one guy talking about how the author of the blurb I posted was a government mouth piece and all of the stereo typical conspiracy theorist rhetoric.

I went to the guys profile and read his self description. He states that he's "anti authority" and a "cognitive dissenter". I sat there and rolled that around in my head, and it hit me. I had an epiphany about people who become fanatical on almost any subject, but especially on the subject of government or corporate conspiracy.

They are much like the old proponents of the spanish inquisition. They state their general ideology and then fit their beliefs to that ideology. At first glance this seems common and almost acceptable. it IS, however, common, but completely delusional.

Instead of getting your perceptions from the experiences, facts, and beliefs constructed by what the evidence presents a person the person takes their perception and makes their experiences, facts, and understanding fit their preconceived beliefs.

Which in the case of one who states that they are a dissenter in the most general sense, and anti authority as a general state of being means that they automatically assume that the government is at fault, those in power are to blame, and everyone but you and your tiny group of friends who agree with your every word are wrong.

Wow, talk about an elitist mindset of the most delusional proportions. Unfortunately, I'm now going to bed with that train of thought stuck in my head.

-One Angry Christian

The Next time you start to forget
One Angry Christian
7/27/06

Just watch this, and you'll remember why you support the war on terrorism.

Click here.

You won't want to watch it twice.

-One Angry Christian

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Dems snub another Iraqi representative
One Angry Christian
7/26/06

Sen. Charles Schumer D-N.Y., said he doubted he would attend al-Maliki's address, and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi hinted she too would boycott the speech. "Unless Mr. Maliki disavows his critical comments of Israel and condemns terrorism, it is inappropriate to honor him with a joint meeting of Congress," said Pelosi, D-Calif.

Another 20 Democrats, including Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, sent a letter to GOP House leadership asking to rescind al-Maliki's invitation to address Congress.

"We are unaware of any prior instance where a world leader who worked against the interests of the United States was afforded such an honor," the Democrats wrote.

Read More

Apparently, these guys weren't getting enough press. Yet another case of the dems pissing on the very people we are trying to support in order to secure some semblance of peace in the middle east.

-One Angry Christian

Saturday, July 22, 2006

The Weekly Funnies
One Angry Christian
7/22/06


This week I finally found a good response to the PC insanity that's been floating around, the New York Times a-typical editorial board meeting, and finally the "what if" scenario of Islamofascist response to Dean becoming president.

1) Bless you, and you, and you, and ESPECIALLY YOU!!!

2) The New York Times sacrifices to the god of PCness.

3) How would the militant Jihadi movement react to dean being president? YEAAAAAAAAAAAARG!!!

BONUS FOOTAGE FROM BRAIN TERMINAL!

And for those who like the pictures that move I give you...

THE CLINTON LEGACY!!!!

Hope everyone is doing well and having a safe and enjoyable weekend.

-One Angry Christian

Friday, July 21, 2006

Moonbat canabalism
One Angry Christian
7/21/06

Ok. Ok Ok. I've been ... stalking the enemy so to speak. I was reading an article on foxnews.com about how things are getting a little "turbulent" over at dailykos, and I have to admit, I was over on the dk site reading around checking out what's been going on. I forget who but one of the many conservative blogs I read asked if the far left was supporting Cynthia McKinney in her run for office.

Well, I found a thread on that site that WELL illustrated the divisions in the left wing of America. I saw everything from a guy being labeled racist for saying he wasn't, to one person being labeled a "Limbaugh" follower for bothering to point out the obvious ridiculousness of Cynthia McKinney calling herself a victim as she's from a prominent wealthy family that leans so far left they make the Kennedy’s look sane. It’s funny how socialists are so willing to use capitalism to their advantage.

The main topic of discussion was barely touched by most of the conversation. They keep going on and on about whether she actually decked the guy because he was racist or not. The general consensus on the thread "For those in the know: McKinney primary challenge info" which originally was about whether or not McKinney is more liberal than her opponent. In fact, the originally post specifically stated that it wanted any negatives about her NOT to include the "cop hitting incident".

Of course if they were talking about a white congressman "hitting" a black female security officer it would have been called the "police brutality" incident.

It was kind of like watching a one armed man try to fight himself. It was rather hysterical. I guess it's true. The left really doesn't really just hate conservatives. They apparently hate each other as well.

Just makes you wonder how far the cannibalism goes in the "netroots" of the leftwing of America.

-One Angry Christian

Todays Top Stories
One Angry Christian
7/21/06


Save the Earth! STARVE THE MASSES!!!

The main problem with bio-fuels, is that producing them causes the world’s cars to compete for the same resources as the world’s hungry stomachs. If you claim to care about world hunger, “social justice,” or simply understand the economic problems of the bio-fuels industry, then you must reject bio-fuels.

We are not the only ones concerned bio-fuel development will end up killing poor people. For example, in the industry’s online clearinghouse site renewableenergyaccess.com some surprising facts come out.


Un Reaps the rewards of protecting terrorists


Hezbollah-fired rockets have hit a UN observation post north of Zarit, according to the Israeli army.
The attack comes as Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said Thursday that the group's leadership remains intact.

Kos Korruption violently protected by kult like following? Who'ld a thunk it!?!?

"[H]ow does a political blogger who endorses candidates at his site create a transparent environment when he may also be consulting for — or have some other undisclosed relationship with — some of these same candidates?" Silverstein asked

Silverstein also voiced his displeasure with how his June 26 blog on this subject was received by the Kossacks.

"In short, I expected some might not like what I wrote. But I simply wasn't prepared for the onslaught," he said.

After sharing some of the malicious attacks he received in the comments section of his blog, Silverstein addressed how the site's administrators appeared to be participating in the bashing rather than performing their prescribed tasks.


Shot of the day, Live from Israel



Hope everyone is having a good day. Be safe.


-One Angry Christian

Thursday, July 20, 2006

So this is what the media and the lefties are calling "freedom fighters"?
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnteresting.
Thanks LFG

-One Angry Christian

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Intellectuals and the art of purposeful ignorance
One Angry Christian
7/19/06

I've been having this discussion with one "intellectual" on my blog who has basically come out and said that anyone who opposes the right to threaten an entire nation with nuclear holocaust is a fascist.

How amazingly European.

The entire discussion revolved around the idea of freedom of speech and the fact that the group of protesters spouting these threats did not have the ability to inflict damage on the US, nor did they have ties to anyone who did. They therefore could not be threatening us.

Obviously the person who supported this "theory" didn't bother to research the group. I found most of this within about five minutes, and most of it on wikipedia.

Islamic Thinkers Society Protests

On April 20, 2006, the ITS demonstrated in front of the Israeli consulate in Manhattan and publicly called for the nuclear destruction of Israel [4] "The mushroom cloud is on its way! The real Holocaust is on its way!" and "Israel won't last long. Indeed, Allah will repeat the Holocaust right on the soil of Israel!" The demonstration included signs that read "Islam will Dominate" and featured a picture with an Islamic flag flying over the White House. A video of this event was also made available to the public on the Internet.

And, of course they were right. This group has no ability to carry out its threats:


Despite denials of having connections to terrorism, some of the members of the Islamic Thinkers Society have been arrested for terrorist activity.


Ok. So "some" is a vague term. Lets get specific.

Mohammed Junaid Babar currently in jail for a 2004 London bombing plot admitted that he was a member of the Islamic Thinkers Society (then called Al-Muhajiroun) and an Islamic organizer for the Islamic Society of Bay Ridge.

They also obviously have no ties to Al Qaeda. I mean hey, he only admitted he is a member of the ITS and then "assisted" the Al Qaeda, but remember this group isn't "capable". We have "nothing to fear from their sign waving".

This kid was a lone high school drop out.

Shahawar Matin Siraj, another ITS member, was arrested on terrorism charges in August of 2004 for planning to detonate a bomb in the 34th Street/Penn Station subway station in New York City.


Apparently he was incapable of actually carrying it out. How could they convict him? I mean hey he didn't ACTUALLY set it off right? I'll take rationalizing away our national defense for 500 Alex: the art of being too "intelligent" to see the obvious. What is intellectualism?

-One Angry Christian

"Free Palestine" rally in San Francisco And the MSM still supporting terrorists
One Angry Christian
7/19/2006


I've been following the Israeli struggle pretty closely the last few weeks. I came across a protest and let the Protest Warriors know about it as some Israeli contacts I have on one of my blogs posted about it. The response to the pro Palestine rally was pretty intense. Judging from the photographs a lot of people showed up to counter this protest and support Israel's right to defend itself from terrorists. you can find pictures of this rally here, here, here, here and here.

It's really Amazing to me how easily the mainstream media is getting used as a tool by the terrorists in this struggle.

Cnn:

"It is very, very dangerous. We are now at the most dangerous place at the most dangerous moment." (Watch attack fears force a CNN crew from ruined Beirut neighborhood -- 4:46)

Pausing before an apartment building, Nabulsi said, "Look what happened to this building, inhabited by innocent civilians ... no military bases, nothing."

I watched that video, and basically the Hezbollah representative rushes the reporter around a damaged neighborhood feeding him a lot of stuff about " there's no one here but civilians", and "there is no military here". I completely agree. The Hezbollah are not military. They're terrorists. What he doesn't mention is that Hezbollah and Hamas both have a habit of forcing their way into civilian homes and using them as a base of operations in effect using the civilians as body shields.

Of course I don't see that mentioned anywhere in the article. They focus on the Hezbollah's fight to protect it's "dignity". A militant group that uses civilians as cannon fodder HAS no dignity. Of course this also makes me wonder if the "civilian casualties" being reported to the MSM are nothing more than a mix of Hezbollah soldiers and civilians massacred while trying to flee by the Hezbollah. Is this the same "freedom" Palestine is trying to obtain? Scary thought.


-One Angry Christian

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

The MSM supports terrorism
One Angry Christian
7/19/06

This is an interesting video I found in a bulletin on myspace by a guy who goes by "smoke". Apparently some Israelis got their hands on the unedited versions of some "news clips" that were shot by Palestinians armed with cameras given them by different news outlets. Of course the one they actually named was french. Go figure right?

You have to see this to believe it. If there is a conspiracy out there that's REAL this is it.

CLICK HERE

-One Angry Christian

Freedom of Speech?

Check out these pictures, and then answer the question below.



Terrorist Expression
Do you think our constitutional freedom of speech covers this sort of expression?


Yes
No













Saturday, July 15, 2006

"Pro Choice" Violence
One Angry Christian
7/15/06

Don't really have to say anything about this. Just watch.

CLICK HERE

-One Angry Christian

The Weekly Funnies
One Angry Christian
7/15/06


This week George W. Bush's birthday gets crashed, the root of all (political) evil, and the closing of a local Palestinian business. The news this week has been rather historic. We've seen everything from Israel out right attacking Lebanon for it's refusal to control the terrorist cells with in it's own borders, North Korea launching it's first long range missiles (that failed miserably), and of course there's the whole "Government official caught with hand in cookie jar". Who would have thought his cookie jar was kept in the freezer, so without further delay ... I give you ... this weeks funnies.


1) George W. Bush Turns sixty and gets a rather ... unpleasant surprise.

2) I'll take political corruption for 500 Alex. ... What is ... political corruption?

3) Israel boycotts long time Palestinian business of "trade".


Hope everyone is having a good weekend. I have just moved so my internet will not be back up until tomorrow. I'll probably be busy so you may not hear from me. Till then ... keep fighting the good fight.

One Angry Christian

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Evan Coyne Maloney is my hero
One Angry Christian
7/12/06


This is one of those "you abso-phreaking-LUTELY have to see this" posts.

We've been talking about protester violence and the influence of universities over the students and how professors have become hell bent on indoctrinating people rather than teaching them how to be "free thinkers". Evan announced to day the release of "Indoctrinate U" which covers a lot of the major conversations being held on this blog.

Evan writes:
Indoctrinate U covers a number of stories never before shown on screen. Some of the stories are bizarre and so hard to believe that you may end up researching them yourself. And if you do, you'll realize that the truth on campus truly is stranger than fiction. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's frightening, and sometimes, it's just plain depressing.

Read More


Evan Coyne Maloney is my hero
One Angry Christian
7/12/06


This is one of those "you abso-phreaking-LUTELY have to see this" posts.

We've been talking about protester violence and the influence of universities over the students and how professors have become hell bent on indoctrinating people rather than teaching them how to be "free thinkers". Evan announced to day the release of "Indoctrinate U" which covers a lot of the major conversations being held on this blog.

Evan writes:
Indoctrinate U covers a number of stories never before shown on screen. Some of the stories are bizarre and so hard to believe that you may end up researching them yourself. And if you do, you'll realize that the truth on campus truly is stranger than fiction. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's frightening, and sometimes, it's just plain depressing.

Read More


Please don't allow these two to breed
One Angry Christian
7/12/06


I believe the UN's absolute lunacy and complete disconnect from reality is complete. The New York Times will soon be running the head line "UN in league with Islamofacism", and liberals will denounce their support for the corrupt world body. Of course about the same time that happens George Soros will admit he's attempting to socially manipulate the US using our school systems to proliferate his secularist socialist agenda and stamp out the "disease" of Christianity.

Check this out (Thanks LGF):

Kofi (I'm not really corrupt) Annan:

Over the years, and especially the past decade, the United Nations and the Organization of the Islamic Conference have worked to promote tolerance, equality, development and the peaceful resolution of conflict.

Read More

but remember: we should adhere to the standards and rules set by this world body. We should put their law above our own, and seek their approval before defending our nation. Riiiiiiiiiiight. The UN and Islamofacim make such a cute couple don't they?

-One Angry Christian

Do I hear an echo?
One Angry Christian
7/12/06


Sometimes after going off about a subject I begin to wonder if I'm alone in my assessments of a particular situation. I know I'm not alone in my assessment of Gitmo, and the Geneva Convention especially in how it applies to captured terrorists. Yet, I had found little to no direct commentary on how wrong the administration and the pentagon are on this particular subject (caving to the demands of the leftist "let the terrorists sue our government using tax payer money" movement). This morning I woke up and started reading my usual blog lists, and I found that ... apparently I'm not alone.


Apparently most of the entire world has forgotten just who is in Gitmo, how they got there and how we have actually treated them. Other than subjecting a few of them to aggressive interrogation techniques that fall far below any reasonable definition of torture, we have treated them well. We have treated them in accordance with the Geneva Conventions in relation to their standing as illegal combatants as defined by the Conventions. Actually, we have treated them better than the Conventions mandate, since under the definitions we could have considered every single member of al Qaeda a spy caught out of uniform and shot on the spot of capture.

Read More



That's almost verbatim what I posted yesterday. Ok, well that's a bit of an exaggeration, but Bryan hits most of my major points from the grand treatment we dish out to these genocidal maniacs to the fact that we DON'T shoot them on sight as spies he dishes up what is a common sense interpretation of the Geneva Convention and why it DOES NOT apply to the Gitmo detainees.

Someone (USMC Kurt 03) pointed out yesterday that the Supreme Court ruled on the Gitmo detainees rights based upon section two of the Geneva Convention. That section WELL defines how "prisoners of war" are to be treated. It gets detailed enough to say that "prisoners of war shall not be intimidated". How's that for hysterical. You can't intimidate a captured enemy combatant? So you're saying that our public schools break the standards of how we should treat people who are trying to kill our soldiers every day? Interesting.

The problem with the Supreme Court ruling that no one is talking about is the fact that a prisoner of war is defined as I previously posted, and terrorists do not fit that description. They fit PART of the Geneva Convention definition, but they do not adhere to the so-called "rules of war", nor do they wear any identifying mark. The Geneva Convention as it is written does not apply to terrorists. Did I say that enough? Is anyone hearing me here? It does NOT apply to TERRORISTS.

Apparently, as Bryan at hotair.com put it "Macsmind takes a much more positive look at this", and after reading his update I can understand why even if I don't really agree. To me it all comes back to the fact that the Left is bending the words of the Geneva Convention to suit their agenda, and unfortunately the Supreme Court is letting them. The fact that Bush isn't standing up against this movement is really disappointing.

It is interesting to see that Bush and our legislators are already scrambling to draft legislation that will deal with trying (read: spending tax payer money to hand over our national defense to high paid lawyers and civil rights activists) terrorists we apprehend. My assessment? This is bad, very VERY bad, and frankly, I think the Bush Administration rolled over on this way too quickly. This was a fight worth having, and worth taking the extra mile on because this situation will be used by the terrorists to their advantage at every turn. Mark my words on that.

Of course, I'm far from alone in that assessment as well. I might be in the minority among some circles in my opinion of this situation, but at least I'm in good company.

-One Angry Christian

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

One Angry Christian's Psychic prediction/UPDATE (Death Toll reaches 200)
One Angry Christian
7/11/06


I am going to make a prediction here:


8 bombs on India commuter trains kill 147

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer 4 minutes ago

BOMBAY, India - Eight bombs hit Bombay's commuter rail network during rush hour Tuesday evening, killing at least 147 people and wounding more than 400 in what authorities called a well-coordinated terrorist attack.

Read more


I will use my mighty psychic prediction powers to predict that this was enacted by the same people we just handed the same rights as every other set of POW's, that being the islamofacists. I'll wager my coffee mug that the attack was performed by a group of militant islamists. Anyone care to take me up on this bet?

Someone explain to me why it is that the left wing goes nuts when we jail someone for consorting with terrorists in a plot to murder innocents, and then they support terrorists in this sort of behavior buy excusing their actions? If you can figure that one out you're more intelligent than I am.

==================UPDATE==================

Death toll in Bombay attacks rises to 200

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - The death toll from a series of bombs that struck Bombay's packed commuter trains rose Wednesday to 200, and India demanded that Pakistan dismantle the "infrastructure of terrorism," but leveled no direct accusation at its rival for the attacks.

Read More

Still no definite answer on who is responsible for this. Isn't anyone going to take me up on this wager? C'mon. I'm in desperate need of a new coffee cup.

==================UPDATE==================

Looks like I win that bet. Too bad no one took me up on it. Ah, well I guess I'll have to suffer through having only ... five mugs to choose from.


-One angry Christian
(So this glowy ball really DOES work)
The Facism of the Left
One Angry Christian
7/11/06


I wasn't kidding when I said I was going to post every example of the facism of the left I come across.

Here, have another dose of what the tollerant left will dish out if they ever come into power.

-One Angry Christian

Protests at the New York Times/ UPDATE: more pictures AND Video


Too bad this sort of thing never gets covered by the MSM. I guess they didn't bring enough Patchouli.

Check this out


=============UPDATE=============


Fight the left has pictures


Hotair.com has video

-One Angry Christian

Pentagon has Lost it's Mind
One Angry Christian
7/11/06


Could someone PLEASE explain to me how terrorists in ANY WAY fit what the Geneva convention describes as a military combatant. Here are the definitions as set up by the Geneva Convention that all the liberals keep claiming describe the Guantanamo detainees.

Article 4

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfill the following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.



Terrorists are NOT covered by the Geneva Convention in any way shape or form. They are not contractors. They are not civilians. They are militias. They do NOT wear a uniform or any sort of emblem, and they do NOT abide by the rules of war. They are NOT military combatants. They are terrorists, and they should be either shot on sight or questioned and THEN shot.

What part of "NOT a member of ANY military" does the Pentagon NOT get? How many college graduate military people does it take to decipher something so damned simple?

-One Angry Christian

Monday, July 10, 2006

Gone for the rest of Today

I'm on most of the time, but today I'm spending time with my kids. I am going to take a second and leave you with

THIS

you simply must watch this. Ward Churchill FINALLY gets his. Bout time too. Consider how much attention you pay to your kid’s education and what kinds of instructors they have.

-One Angry Christian

Sunday, July 09, 2006

The Case for war with North Korea Part 2
One angry Christian
7/9/06


If you never watch or read anything I post break that habit on this one post.

Everyone must see this

Liberty In North Korea

-One Angry Christian
ps. Pass this one to everyone.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

Where is the media?
One Angry Christian
7/8/06



DOZENS of children mercilessly attacked by mortars. Four SLAUGHTERED for NO aparent reason! OH THE HUMANITY! ... Wait. It wasn't the US forces? It was a terrorist attack? Oh, nevermind. that's not news.

Sounds like a really bad saturday night live skit gone completel askew doesn't it? Unfortunately, it's not.

Read This

On Friday night, terrorists in the northern Baghdad district of Khadimiyah fired mortars into a field used by children to play and killed four and wounded 38 others, all children. This type of senseless attack has been repeated over and over again by the Islamic death cult, who harbor no regard for the lives of the most innocent among us.


-One Angry Christian

Ok, so I can't stand Penn and Teller, but this was hysterical. This was awesome. You simply have to see this, and please pass this on to your friends. Thanks to conservative67 for finding this.

CLICK HERE

-One Angry Christian
The Facism of the Left and their online censorship
One Angry Christian
7/8/06


This is yet another example of how the left screams "civil rights" when it suits them and then tramples the rights of others. Every time I find something like this I'm going to post it for those "moderate" lefties who read my blog who keep trying to tell me that it's the right not the left who are "imposing their standards".

I have taken part in discussion on many left and right wing sites. It always seems to be the right wing sites that get knocked offline by these sorts of attacks.

Point in case from little green footballs:

Friday, July 07, 2006

The Internet Jihad

Jeff Goldstein is back and he’s proud, after a pair of DoS attacks took his site offline earlier: protein wisdom.

UPDATE at 7/8/06 7:32:58 am:

Nope, he’s still down. And it may have something to do with this: BLACKFIVE: A New Low.


This sort of thing makes me really angry with those on the left who out right lie about their desires for "equality". It does nothing but prove those who are on the far FAR right correct in their assesment of those on the left.

========UPDATE========

protein wisdom is Back online for anyone who's been paying attention to this. Of course Jeff Goldstein is having a bit of fun at his assailant’s expense. Can't say I blame him after having his server attacked. I don't think he's going to peruse finding out where the attacks came from so they can be prosecuted which I find disappointing.

If I remember correctly under current law internet attacks of that sort based upon one's political views can be classified under terrorism. It would be interesting to see how a suit of that sort would go. People on either side should be held accountable for that sort of thing.

HotAir's Allah pundit has more... a LOT more. Apparently she resigned from her position at the University as a professor of psychology or whatever it was she was doing there. She's was also one professor who defended Ward Churchill, and a member of a 9/11 conspiracy theory group according to Allah Pundit.

This woman is teaching our youth? Seriously, what kind of standards do these universities HAVE?!?!

For once I actually get to give kudos to a liberal blogger which is a very refreshing and altogether enjoyable thing. If you read nothing else you should read Jeralyn Merritt's post about the event. Kudos to you, many Kudos. I wish more people on either side had that kind of brass.

-One Angry Christian

The Weekly Funnies
One Angry Christian
7/8/06


This week I have had to dig a bit. Let's start with number one:

1) The first item though did just jump at me and scream "POST ME!!! POST ME!!!" Of course, you've probably already seen this. It's hotair.com's "Send Cindy Sheehan home telethon" video. It's hysterical. The best part of the video was Konya West's quote "George Bush doesn't care about black people". Ah, I had almost forgotten that hysterically ridiculous and politically slanted quote. Thanks for the reminder Michelle. That was hilarious.

2) This item I found (mostly cuz I'm trying not to post yet another Cox and Forkum Cartoon) via a link on Cox & Forukum's site. I just about fell out of my seat when I came across John Pritchett's Cartoon depicting Al Queda's secret weapon. It kind of reminds me of "Team America's" image of Moore covered in hotdog mustard.

3) The third and final item for this week's Funnies is older, but definitely a classic. This goes out to all of our troops and anyone sick of the PC bs that the media keeps shoving on everyone. I give you... IRAQ NEWS with subtitles.

I hope everyone had a great weekend. I'm stuck at work as usual so feel free to comment away, or message me. Boredom reigns supreme.

-One Angry Christian

Ironically I just picked up a copy of her newest book "Godless". I logged in this morning and found someone had posted a link to an interview she had with the New York Post.

(Hat Tip to Micheal In Michigan)

My favorite quote:


NY POST: Your characterization of liberals paints them as extremists. But with people like Pat Robertson telling us how God keeps telling him who He's angry at, isn't it fair to say that there are extremists on both sides?

A: Pat Robertson opposes capital punishment, opposed the impeachment of Bill Clinton and supports trade with China, just for starters. Seems like a pretty mixed bag to me. So what makes you call him extreme? That he believes he has dialogue with the Lord? Do liberals now call anyone who thinks this an "extremist"?

Read More


This is exactly what a lot of liberals think. Of course, some liberals believe God talks to people they just think that if God says anything that might imply rules, or distinguishing right from wrong ... it must be the voices in your head. How Ironic. Moses must have suffered from a multiple personality disorder.

-One Angry Christian

Friday, July 07, 2006

I really hope she runs. I would love to see her get stomped into the dirt.

Read more here

======UPDATE=======

Aparently people are taking up donations to help Cindy Sheehan unite with her favorite communist dictator.
Check THIS out.

======UPDATE=======

Seriously, you have to see Michele Malkins video on this. It's HISTERICAL!

-One Angry Christian
Unemployment at 4.6% and holding. Pay rates up, but who cares?
One Angry Christian
7/7/2006


Aparently not the media. The ap ran this headline today:

Friday, July 7, 2006, 5:31 AM PDT

WASHINGTON (AP) The Labor Department says employers added 121,000 jobs in June; the unemployment rate held steady at 4.6 percent.

Of course CNN had this to say:

Job growth weak again
June employment report shows pickup from May reading, but payroll gain below forecasts; wages show largest 1-year gain since '01.

Why do they always focus on the most negative value of the report? Shouldn't the bold headline read more like "Wages gain largest bound since 01". Aparently that makes bush look good as well as the fact that unemployment is a FULL POINT below where it was under the clinton administration, but we can't talk about that. That might be positive.


Msnbc had this to say:


U.S. payrolls grew by tepid 121,000 in June

Report suggests companies are reluctant to bulk up their workforces



You would think our economy was falling apart at this point, but if you ask any left wing advocate they'll tell you that it IS falling apart. They wont talk about how much pay has increased or how many more jobs we have under Bush than we had under Clinton, nor will they acknowlege how much revenue the tax cuts are generating. No! You can't do that! That might make Bush look GOOD! Then the dems might lose their bid in 08.

Once more it becomes obvious that the left is willing to scream whatever blatant misrepresentations and lies they have to in order to gain power. It makes one wonder what kind of honesty towards their promises we can expect if they happen to win the house, senate, or whitehouse. I guess we'll have to wait and find out.

-One Angry Christian

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Sheehan, antiwar protesters begin July 4 fast

Some say protest will last until American troops return from Iraq

WASHINGTON - About 150 protesters sat in front of the White House Monday to savor their last meal before starting a hunger strike that some said will continue until American troops return from Iraq.


I find this whole thing absolutely hilarious. My first reaction was "well, I hope they maintain their fast until the troops come home", but then I later read (as not ALL news agencies reported the ENTIRE story as usual) that they were "relaying" their fast.

What the hell is that? How do you "relay" a fast? Seriously, they're taking one day for each of them to fast.

“We have to put our own lives on the line, and I’m willing to do that,” said activist Diane Wilson, who pledged to fast until the United States withdraws from Iraq.

Dearborn said 2,700 other activists nationwide, including actors Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn, would work as a relay team passing the fast daily from one to another.

There are 2700 people taking part in a "relay" fast? What does that mean? That one person has to fast ... every seven years? I know that not every SINGLE person is involved in the relay and the circles are probably a bit smaller, but some people are fasting EVERY WEEK, and we don't hear about them on fifteen news feeds bemoaning what they are fasting over.

Why do these people get special attention? Why aren't we giving this kind of attention to those who fast FOR our troops? Why aren't we giving this kind of attention to people who fast for the prosperity of our nation? Why don't we give this kind of attention to people who fast for protection over our leaders or wisdom for our leaders? Why is it that celebrity protestors, screaming socialists, and those in favor of murdering unborn children get face time with the camera and the rest of us get ignored?

One word, six Letters: agenda.

-One Angry Christian

The right leaning trends in North America and Beyond
One Angry Christian
7/6/2006

Lately, I have noticed a trend in North American politics, not just US politics. The political atmosphere of North America is leaning further and further right. Of course, many conservatives would dispute this claim citing problematic instances caused by groups like moveon.org, the New York Times, and the fact that people are becoming more and more open about being communist.

It's true that the left is better organized, more motivated, and hugely funded as well as backed by the mainstream media (of the MSM as most conservative bloggers call it), BUT ... (yes that's a butt monkey for you Laura Ingram fans out there) the fact is that regardless of it's funding, backing, organizational structures, and motivations the left is LOSING the war for the hearts and minds of America.

Consider the fact that the cable news outlet with the highest ratings and a vastly more participator audience is The Fox News Channel. Consider that the left's only talk radio station (or has it yet been reduced to a show?) "Air America" has less than a one percent share in listener ship. Consider that Rush Limbaugh is STILL popular despite the lefts attempts to destroy him using his own personal issues to attack and belittle him using the MSM (there's that term again), a tactic that they say is distinctly a right wing tool that they are "above". That claim makes me laugh with nausea ever time I hear it.

Think about the fact that movies like "The Incredibles", "Saving Private Ryan", and "The passion of the Christ" which also rates in the top TEN of all time US box office profits. (Who were those tards who said it would be a flop? That would be the left.) More recently we've seen Glen Beck (God Bless Glen Beck) on CNN'S (for those who don't know that's the communist news network, or was it Clinton's news network? I can never remember) Headlice news ... errr ... HeadLINE news. Sorry. Ok. Well, not really, but that's ok.

Some people in Hollywood have even decided it's "ok" to be conservative or even (gasp) REPUBLICAN! Kid Rock is a republican. Unfortunately, so is Britney Spears. Did I mention Arnold Schwarzenegger? Now, I could be wrong but I think Mel Gibson is a conservative as well considering he risked his career as an actor to finance, direct, and produce (but not star in for once) his masterpiece "The Passion of the Christ" which cost roughly 45 million to make and market, and brought in over six hundred million in box office sales world wide. That actually puts it in the top fifty of the highest all time world wide box office sales (number thirty according to www.imdb.com).

So in the midst of all of this conservatism that's invading America what are the liberals to do? Move to Canada? Apparently not. Canada is going conservative. According to their election results the Canadian Conservative Party has gained a tremendous amount of momentum and in the last election gained twenty five seats as well as the Prime Minister's own seat.

As I have just now googled "conservative Canada" I can see the liberals screaming bloody murder. The pot people are bemoaning that they will soon lose their rights, and the homosexual rights sites are screaming "bigot" on every site my search turned up. It's amazing how much hatred one Google can turn up.

Well, that's it. Go south instead. I know. MEXICO! That's where they should go.

Ah, but not so fast. Apparently, Felipe Calderon (a conservative candidate) has just declared victory in Mexico over his liberal opponent. Of course, his liberal opponent is pulling an Al Gore, and threatening to sue. That's right folks; if you can't get enough votes just beat them down with your monetary muscles in court. That's the liberal way. Some how I seriously doubt that's going to go over well with the public there.

What's a liberal to do when all of North America is becoming over whelmed with conservative bigots and their capitalist big money corporate power?!? Where are the little guys like George Soros, Jane Fonda, John Edwards, and Fidel Castro who'll stand up to far right extremists and their "morals" and "values". What are these morals and where do they come from anyway? Didn't anyone tell the right wing that God lost the election after we sued him over voter fraud, and had him arrested for hate speech against homosexuals? Seriously now, God's a myth! Only idiots believe in God.

That's why we believe that our fifteen percent of the population should be able to take offense at and have removed any public Christian image, word, theme, statement, and/or idea, and publish, broadcast, and otherwise shove our homosexuality, pornography, profane language, and various other forms of "free expression" we feel like spreading around en masse.

Ah liberals. Ya gotta love 'em.

Maybe we should pack them all up and ship them back to Europe where they can be over run by Islamofacists, and over taxed by their socialist mentors.

Hold the presses. Europe has been cutting some taxes and talking about a flat tax. Gee, that sounds mighty conservative.

To where shall we ship all of the soon to be homeless liberals? I have two options to suggest: Russia and Cuba. Let them live under the dictators and socialist regime's they love. Meanwhile we'll continue prospering.

- One Angry Christian

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

A CODE PINK 4th of July, Washington DC.

Scroll down for video and more photos (many more)!

Ya gotta love it ...

This isn't Kansas anymore, Toto: these people live in a world where these things are worn proudly.
View This Blog



If you hit this blog you'll see several pictures of this "peace protest", and a couple of videos. One of the videos has a group of kids drowning out "Code Pink" (who was butchering America the beautiful) singing "America the Beautiful" as it was intended, with respect. I just wish the MSM covered these protests in full rather than just playing the snippets showing what makes the movement look peaceable and acceptable.

If only the MSM wasn't owned by the left wing movement we MIGHT actually get to see this stuff.

-One Angry Christian

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

The tip of the iceberg

Liberal Special interests supporting and advocating voter Fraud


One liberal group seems to think that everyone should get to register to vote no matter whether they're legally entitled to vote. The only disqualifying factor might be if the prospective voter doesn't support the group's radical agenda.

That group is ACORN, also known as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. As revealed by research from the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's Jonathan Bechtle, ACORN pays its employees by the number of voters they register. In Ohio in 2004, state election officials started to receive voter registration cards from ACORN that were filled out in identical handwriting for names with false addresses.

In Minnesota, police found hundreds of signed registration cards in the trunk of a worker who was suspected of registering voters twice to double his fees. In Colorado, a woman reportedly helped her boyfriend forge names on registration forms to help him make $50.

Read More


I've been doing some research while I had to work the third and fourth. It's very interesting some of the stuff that I've found. This particular snippet is a sample of the massive amounts of dirt under the rugs of the left that I've unearthed. Later I am going to try and put together a post covering the general mass of all of the under workings of the left's network in America, how they're funded, who's funding them, and who they are associated with.

The conclusion that I've come to is that every conspiracy theory that the left has concocted about the right is simply based off of the fact that they have a guilty conscience from their own personal habits.

This article is only the tip of the iceberg of what I found based off of public reports and records pointing out the absolute hypocrisy and at times conspiracy of the left to manipulate the media, our school systems, our votes, and our government in an attempt to seize power and move America towards being a communist secular society.

It may sound far fetched, but what I've found is absolute proof that at least in part the far right has been right all along; sad, and rather scary, but very VERY true.

-One Angry Christian