Thursday, September 06, 2007

Something that'll make you giggle

I love how Huckabee handles this.



And of course this perfectly describes the UN.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Best Post ... EVER!
One Angry Christian
8-22-07


You really must read this. Please make sure you're not drinking anything when you open it.

-One Angry Christian
(In favor of needlessly burning hippies)

Monday, August 20, 2007

Details Details Details...
One Angry Christian
8/20/07


First read the Fox News Article. After you finish it (it's rather small so it shouldn't take long) then read Neil Boortz article about the same exact event.

Can anyone find another article written by any other blogger or journalist that mentions that silver mine?

Could someone please explain to me why college educated "intellectuals" don't see that as a REALLY PHREAKING MAJOR DETAIL they're leaving out? No media bias my hairy white butt.

-One Angry Christian


Sunday, August 19, 2007

Did ya miss me?
One Angry Christian
8-19-07


So I'm back for a bit as I just couldn't pass up a few of the stories I've come across online. You simply have to read this tripe to believe it. Of course, I found it at hotairDOTcom.

The hallowed halls of journalism that I was privileged to enter more than 20 years ago are looking more and more like the New York subway. The walls covered in bloggers' scrawl, the platform crowded with any yahoo with a camera and an open mike. All are headed to your computer screen or television for the 15 seconds you'll give them before moving on to the next hot spot. That's not how we do things at this newspaper.

Here, every morning, some 20 smart, educated, well-read and diverse people gather around a table and talk.

I'd like to point out a couple of very obvious things in this article. The first being that it's hilarious that this "educated" journalist was admittedly nailed to the wall by bloggers who may not have first caught the story but certainly drove it home.

Sucks when you get caught doesn't it?

So what does one do when they're caught doing something that they shouldn't be doing yet some how are convinced that they should be allowed to do? ... Well, that's simple... attack the source. If you have no real way to attack their argument or if you have a valid reason to fear that if you do attack their argument that your boss will hand you your head on a platter go after their character or work on general premiss.

I believe this is what an "intellectual" temper tantrum looks like. At least I think so, but I wouldn't know as I'm conservative. Conservatives are incapable of intellectualism. The medial told me so. It must be true.

The thing that kills me about people like her, and the way the blogs react are rather simple. First off, Nicole Brodeur is trying hard here to make an honest apology for letting her opinion come out around people who may disagree with her, but have the sense to keep their mouths shut. The blogs on the right obviously pointed it out as if anyone would care.

I hate to inform most of my fellow conservatives out there, but most of those whom this would reach are already convinced. The rest are so far on the left that the middle is no longer visible to them. I've gotten used to this idea. Sadly, it's accurate.

I'm not trying to say that you shouldn't point it out. I'm simply saying understand that it's of little effect.

That's not really what "gets me" about the reaction on the right blogosphere. What really makes me smirk is that anyone would complain. I mean, we all know the media is biased. It's obvious from the way the head lines are written, to the stories that are picked for every major front page, to the way in which the media is practically a casualty / injury / wrong doing ticker screaming every time one of our people dies, is injured, or does something inhumane.

It's become painfully obvious whose side the media is on, and it's not ours. All they need is a jihadi scarf and to throw "death to America" in between blurbs, and you'd have Al Queda's very own propaganda machine. No. I'm not exaggerating, and if you think that then move closer to center. Stay away from Michael Moore's "we hate America" trash, and quit reading Alex Jones. If you can't do that then please go get shock therapy or at the very least don't procreate.

The fact that 25% of all Americans believe that our government knew 9/11 was going to happen or was in some way complicit in the event, and yet somehow ONLY point blame to George W. Bush as the evil demon that is responsible when many memos of the same nature Came Across Clinton's desk is a huge indicator of what kind of group think our media is instilling in the masses.

The fact that this group think conspiracy theorist mind set is specifically targeting conservatives who tend to be Christians, Republicans who tend to be conservative (if they were more so I'd be happier with my party), and of course Jews. It seems that the whole world hates people who want a smaller government bent on national defense and Liberty, Christians, and Jews who tend to thrive in the previously mentioned environment. Crazy isn't it?

With that said, I leave you with yet more evidence that Racism in America is live and well.



Too bad the media cares a lot less that black leaders are firing white workers than they do that Bush's Attorney General fired less people than Clinton's, and that was before she sent armed agents to kick down the door of an unarmed family with sub machine guns and gas grenades to remove a small child so the child could be shipped back to ... Communist Cuba, and before she massacred a compound of religious nuts who'd never blown up a sky scraper full of innocent civilians. In fact, they'd never actually hurt... anyone.

I know it's a total rip off, but "Exit Question". Do you think that the ACLU will get involved with this obvious racial firing incident, and finally are you naive enough to believe that they'll actually be on whitey's side? I sure hope not.

-One Angry Christian

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Quick Question
One Angry Christian
4-26-07


The Democratic Senate has complained about Bush's "abuse of power". They have just passed a bill demanding the troops leave Iraq starting on Oct 1st.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but the Senate ... isn't the "Commander in Chief" of the U.S. Military. If they're not, and they're trying to use their power to command said army - isn't that.. an abuse of power?

Can we impeach them?

I think we need a website to start that movement. If someone doesn't have one soon I'll be seriously disappointed and surprised.

-One Angry Christian

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Want to know what I've been upto?
One Angry Christian
4-21-07


So I've been busy with working on this because it's for a worthy cause:



-One Angry Christian

Sunday, March 18, 2007

From point A to point B
One Angry Christian
3-18-07


Step One: Seize the media

Step Two: Frame the opposition as the enemy of the State

Step Three: Use the media push the opposing party out of power.

Step Four: Make the opposing party illegal.

Step Five: Make the expression of the beliefs that form opposition illegal.

Step Six: Authoritarian Dictatorship complete.
Nuff said.

-One Angry Christian
Reaping what you sew
One Angry Christian
3-18-07


Yes Nancy. They are your constituency ... whether you like it or not.

At the risk of seeming heartless I have to say


BWAHAHAHHAAAAAA!!!

-One Angry Christian
How Democrats Practice that "free flow of information" they preach
One Angry Christian
3-18-07


There's a lot of ironic content in this article I just read, but one part really caught my attention.

It was after the speech that I shook his hand. Ian and I spent a few minutes chatting with a couple of conservatives who also survived the speech, and then proceeded to get out of the building. Who was standing atop the stairs, talking with students before heading out to the street? Why, Terry Mac himself. So I got his attention, called him a “good sport” and shook his hand. He told us he’d have to sue the school if I post the video, which really isn’t my problem but word given, the video (which isn’t all that exciting anyway) stays offline. Then he went one way and we went the other. Down the hall a ways, he called out “It’ll be an interesting 2008!”
Emphasis mine obviously, but that should stick out like a sore thumb. Bryan at Hotair.com calls the article "Terry McAuliffe: Chavez is Bush’s fault". He really should have called it "Terry McAuliffe: Screw freedom of information". The case can be made that his words were posted, but the information is stripped of the context of his demeanor, the attitude of the predominantly liberal crowd, and the way he treated those posing questions.

While that might seem trivial it's beneficial to remember that if this guy were a Republican and he threatened to sue someone over posting video of him on the internet it would be front page news. What's even more ironic is that I've googled the topic, and I can't find one instance of a Republican threatening to sue someone for simply posting video of a speech he or she gave.

I do, however, remember how the Dems used veiled threats to pull the broadcast license of someone else who wanted to air something that would make them look bad, or at least put the situation in a context other than what they had presented it as. I guess they couldn't get Sandy Berger on the video cutting room floor to destroy the evidence.

Next time some Dem tries to tell you how the Republicans hide stuff from you keep in mind that we weren't the ones shredding documents that would have shed more light on the "path to 9\11".

Only a Democrat would censor "The path to 9-11" as right wing propaganda dangerous to America, and call Michael Moore's out right lies "free expression that benefits the discussion". This mentality betrays the mentality that has over taken the far left in American where in the Truth becomes inconvenient and therefore traded off for whatever intellectually deluded concoction can gain traction in the popular culture and put the far left in power.

Power to the people in deed.

-One Angry Christian